By Balbir B Bhasin, May 18, 2012
....
The recent election
to parliament of Burmese pro-democracy leader Aung
San Suu Kyi and her party heralds a new dawn for
this struggling Southeast Asian nation now called
Myanmar. The Nobel laureate was released from 15
years under house arrest only in November 2010.
Last year saw a nominally civilian government take
over from over five decades of repressive military
rule. The government even invited international
observers to witness the elections.
Eleven
ceasefire agreements with ethnic minorities and
rebels have been signed. Key political freedoms
such as the right to organize, assemble,
speak out and run for political office are being
exercised in a way that was unthinkable even a
year ago. Myanmar's political opening is moving in
parallel with efforts to rewrite investment laws
and unify multiple exchange rates that impede
trade.
The US has restored diplomatic
relations with Myanmar and sanctions are being
lifted by the US, the European Union and
Australia, while Japan has agreed to write off
past debt. Relations with the World Bank, the
International Monetary Fund and the Asian
Development Bank are being restored. The currency
has been floated. The rulers of Myanmar (also
known as Burma) say the reforms are irreversible.
For over two decades, the United States
and the European Union attempted to use the
''hard-nosed'' approach of broad sanctions to
force Myanmar to reform its governance and change
its behavior. These have included cessation of
trade, suspension of aid, an arms embargo, refusal
to negotiate, freezing of assets, and imposition
of travel restrictions on the country's leaders.
As early as 1998, the Cato Institute had
concluded that "The US policy of imposing
unilateral trade and investment sanctions against
Burma has proven to be a failure on all fronts. By
forcing US firms to disengage from Burma, that
policy has harmed American economic interests and
done nothing to improve the living conditions or
human rights of the people of Burma."
On
the other hand, members of the Association of
South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) welcomed Myanmar
as an equal partner in the ten-nation community
and patiently waited for it to make the changes
the world has been waiting for. Instead of using
coercive diplomacy, the Southeast Asian grouping
opted to fall back on its eastern roots. Described
as the "Asean Way", the members have preferred
informal personal diplomacy for problem solving
and to achieve harmony and cooperation.
They felt that the best way to bring
together the multitude of diverse cultures and
differing levels of development that exist in
Southeast Asia was through understanding, respect,
tolerance, consensus, friendship and above all
non- intervention. These principles are actually
enshrined in their founding document.
Though vilified as a pariah state, Myanmar
was granted full membership to ASEAN in 1997. This
was done in spite of Western pressure. Not only
that, but Myanmar was also given fast track
admission - in only two years - while Vietnam and
Cambodia had waited nearly four years and Laos
six. This special treatment seems well planned. It
could have been to counter China's influence in
Myanmar, but was most likely to make Myanmar feel
welcome into the union.
The expectation
was that ASEAN would ultimately be rewarded in the
tradition of "one good turn deserves another."
Over the years ASEAN members continued to
implement their policy of "constructive
engagement" by not criticizing the Burmese
government in public while continuing to trade and
invest in Myanmar's economy, thus providing it a
lifeline.
And last November, ASEAN went
even further. It decided to endorse the assumption
of the association's chairmanship to Myanmar in
2014 based on "encouraging signs" of reforms that
they had seen. "They are on the road to greater
democratization and are also being more inclusive.
The ASEAN position is we should do more to
encourage Myanmar down this road," said the Prime
Minister of Malaysia Najib Razak. ASEAN's efforts
had paid dividends.
Indonesia's foreign
minister Dr Marty Natalegawa points out that the
decision to give Myanmar the chairmanship was not
so much a reward for its reforms but an inducement
to live up to international expectations. "It is
not a vote of confidence," he said. "But it's
actually what our expectation of how it will be in
2014."
The reasons for the sudden change
in Myanmar are still open to debate but what is
certain is that the expectations of all the
stakeholders have risen exponentially. Asian
Development Bank figures indicate that the economy
has already been significantly bolstered by a 26%
jump in tourist arrivals and a 15% rise in gas
exports that alone are worth US$3 billion in
annual revenue. The bank said it forecasts GDP
growth to rise from 5.5% in 2011 to 6% in 2012,
and at least 6.3% the following year.
These estimates may prove conservative and
could rise substantially when sanctions are eased
as the Myanmar government continues on its path of
reform. Both the ASEAN community and the West are
expecting this to be the case. Meanwhile, the
Burmese people are certainly holding their breath
for new opportunities in income, education, and
quality of life.
Dr Balbir
Bhasin is an entrepreneur turned scholar and
author of the book Doing Business in the ASEAN
Countries, published by Business Expert Press,
New York. He is the Ross Pendergraft Endowed
Professor of International Business at the
University of Arkansas, Fort Smith. He also
advises companies seeking to enter the emerging
markets.
Speaking Freely is an Asia
Times Online feature that allows guest writers to
have their say. Please
click here if you are interested in
contributing. Articles submitted for this section
allow our readers to express their opinions and do
not necessarily meet the same editorial standards
of Asia Times Online's regular contributors.
(Copyright 2012 Balbir
Bhasin.)
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/NE18Ae01.html
Friday, May 18, 2012
ASEAN shows "The Way" as Myanmar opens
2:13 PM
Waa Haa Haa
No comments
0 comments:
Post a Comment